Free Essay: abstinence only education programs.
Argumentative Essay on Abstinence-only Sex Education. Sex education programs were first introduced to public school systems in 1913. Since then, this form of education has been a hot and debatable topic among many Americans. The original reason for sex education classes was to reduce problems such as venereal diseases and prostitution.
Literature about abstinence-only sex education was analyzed to compile this literature review. Due to the inception of abstinence-only sex education in the United States in 1982, only articles published from then until 2015 were considered relevant. This review only considered articles pertaining to abstinence-only sex education in the.
While teaching about sexual abstinence has always been a salient part of sexuality education in the United States, only in the last decades of the 1900s did the idea of teaching sexual abstinence to the exclusion of other components of sexuality become the dominant discourse in sexuality education.
The findings concluded that abstinence-only education is Teaching an abstinence-only approach to sex education in the US has a perverse effect, according to a new meta-analysis. In an effort to.
Twenty-eight out of fifty states are required to teach abstinence-only as either the only or main method in order to prevent pregnancy and STD-transmission, and in thirty-three states, education about contraceptive use either is not in policy or is not covered in the state’s sex education program at all.
Abstinence Education and Teen Sexual Health Beginning as an effort to curb teenage pregnancy rates, abstinence-only education has come to dominate the American public school system. Abstinence supporters have used the general drop in teenage pregnancy to justify these programs, despite the.
The government has an eight-point definition of abstinence-only education that requires programs to teach that sexual activity outside of marriage is wrong, for any age (Guttmacher 3).
Two scientific review papers find abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and policies in the United States are ineffective because they do not delay sexual initiation or reduce sexual risk behaviors. According to the researchers, these programs also violate adolescent human rights, withhold medically accurate information, stigmatize or exclude many youth, reinforce harmful gender stereotypes.
Abstinence-only-until-marriage education is not only ineffective, but does a psychological disservice to teenagers. In spite of the original stipulations imposed upon these programs that required them to be free of religious reference, abstinence education is mostly linked to and funded by religious groups.
While 37 states have laws requiring that abstinence is included in sex education, only 18 states require educators to also share information about birth control. Whether or not sex education is LGBTQ-inclusive is also left up to state and local governments to decide.
Most states currently have a policy requiring HIV education, usually in conjunction with broader sex education. Meanwhile, as debate over the relative merits of abstinence-only-until-marriage messages versus more comprehensive approaches has intensified, states have enacted a number of specific content requirements.
Abstinence Only vs. Comprehensive Sex Education: What are the arguments? What is the evidence? is a document focusing on the impact of abstinence and comprehensive sex education programs established in United States. Indeed, the United States still has the highest rates of STIs and teen pregnancy of any industrialized nation. Since President Bush, the Congress tends to promotes abstinence-only.
Position paper Abstinence-only education policies and programs: A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine Summary Abstinence from sexual intercourse represents a healthy choice for teenagers, as teenagers face considerable risk to their reproductive health from unintended pregnancy and.
